The full record

Sources & Bibliography

Every statistic and study used anywhere on this website appears below with its geography, population, data year, publisher, methodology, and the wording we consider accurate. If a number appears on a page and not on this list, treat the page as wrong and tell us.

43 records in the registry · 15 re-checked against the primary source by JRX staff · 28 pending verification. Records pending verification are published with their source link but are not used in print or funding materials.

Statistics · 30 records

Public data, by publisher

Florida Chamber Foundation (Florida Scorecard, aggregating FLDOE data)

1 record

  • ~38%Lee County kindergarten readiness under Florida's current benchmark

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Entering kindergarten students · Data year Current benchmark period

    The Florida Scorecard — kindergarten readiness

    Methodology: Florida changed its kindergarten readiness cut score in 2024, so figures before and after are not comparable. This value comes from a secondary aggregator whose own pages showed inconsistent county figures (38% and 48%); JRX is re-checking it against FLDOE's primary release before publishing it as settled.

    Accurate wording: Under Florida's current readiness benchmark, roughly 38% of entering Lee County kindergarteners met the standard in the cited period.

    Not supported by this number: Do not compare this figure with pre-2024 readiness rates, and do not describe children below the benchmark as incapable.

    Verification pendingLEE_KINDERGARTEN_READINESS

Florida Department of Children and Families

1 record

  • 18.0%Florida high school students reporting four or more adverse childhood experiences

    Florida · Florida · High school students, self-reported · Data year 2024

    Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey, 2024 State Report

    Accurate wording: About 18.0% of surveyed Florida high school students reported four or more adverse childhood experiences (FYSAS 2024).

    Not supported by this number: Never use severe-adversity data as a marketing or fundraising device.

    Verified 2026-08-22FL_ACE_FOUR_PLUS

Florida Department of Children and Families / Florida Youth Survey

1 record

  • 29.9%Florida middle and high school students reporting feeling depressed or sad on most days

    Florida · Florida · Middle and high school students, self-reported · Data year 2024

    Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey, 2024 State Report

    Accurate wording: About 29.9% of surveyed Florida students reported feeling sad or hopeless almost every day for two or more weeks in the past year (FYSAS 2024).

    Not supported by this number: Never convert a self-reported symptom measure into a diagnosis.

    Verified 2026-08-22FL_YOUTH_SAD_2025

Florida Department of Education

1 record

  • 1.5%Lee County dropout rate

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public secondary students · Data year Most recent reported period

    Florida's High School Cohort Dropout Rate

    Accurate wording: Lee County reported a dropout rate of approximately 1.5% in the cited period.

    Not supported by this number: Do not equate a low dropout rate with every student being connected to a pathway after school.

    Verification pendingLEE_DROPOUT_RATE

Florida Scorecard / Florida education data

5 records

  • 52%Lee County third graders meeting the current reading benchmark

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school third graders · Data year Current reported period

    Statewide assessment results by district

    Accurate wording: About 52% of Lee County third graders met the current state reading benchmark in the cited period.

    Not supported by this number: Do not describe the other students as 'failing readers' or predict any individual child's future from this number.

    Verification pendingLEE_READING_G3_CURRENT
  • 59%Lee County third graders meeting the current math benchmark

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school third graders · Data year Current reported period

    Statewide assessment results by district

    Accurate wording: About 59% of Lee County third graders met the current state math benchmark.

    Not supported by this number: Do not present this as a measure of teacher quality or family effort.

    Verification pendingLEE_MATH_G3_CURRENT
  • 56%Lee County eighth graders meeting the current reading benchmark

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school eighth graders · Data year Current reported period

    Statewide assessment results by district

    Accurate wording: About 56% of Lee County eighth graders met the current state reading benchmark.

    Not supported by this number: Do not treat a single benchmark as a full picture of a student's literacy.

    Verification pendingLEE_READING_G8_CURRENT
  • 61%Lee County eighth graders meeting the current math benchmark

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school eighth graders · Data year Current reported period

    Statewide assessment results by district

    Accurate wording: About 61% of Lee County eighth graders met the current state math benchmark.

    Not supported by this number: Do not compare across years when assessment methodology changed.

    Verification pendingLEE_MATH_G8_CURRENT
  • 48%Lee County eighth graders meeting the current science benchmark

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school eighth graders · Data year Current reported period

    Statewide assessment results by district

    Accurate wording: About 48% of Lee County eighth graders met the current state science benchmark.

    Not supported by this number: Do not use this to characterize students' curiosity or scientific ability.

    Verification pendingLEE_SCIENCE_G8_CURRENT

HRSA / National Survey of Children's Health

2 records

  • 10.6%U.S. children ages 3–17 reported as currently having an anxiety problem

    National · United States · Children ages 3–17, parent-reported · Data year 2022

    National Survey of Children's Health, 2022

    Accurate wording: In the 2024 National Survey of Children's Health, about 11.6% of children ages 3–17 were reported as currently having an anxiety problem.

    Not supported by this number: Do not restate a parent-reported measure as a diagnosis rate.

    Verified 2026-08-22US_ANXIETY_3_17
  • 25.8%U.S. children ages 3–17 with a reported mental, emotional, developmental, or behavioral condition

    National · United States · Children ages 3–17, parent-reported · Data year 2022

    National Survey of Children's Health, 2022

    Methodology: This is a broad composite measure spanning developmental and behavioral conditions such as ADHD, learning differences, and speech or developmental delays. It is not a measure of mental illness.

    Accurate wording: About 27% of U.S. children ages 3–17 were reported to have at least one mental, emotional, developmental, or behavioral condition under this broad composite measure.

    Not supported by this number: Never describe this figure as a mental illness rate.

    Verified 2026-08-22US_BROAD_MEB_3_17

HRSA Maternal and Child Health Bureau / National Survey of Children's Health

1 record

  • 17.9%U.S. adolescents ages 12–17 reported as currently having depression or anxiety

    National · United States · Adolescents ages 12–17, parent-reported · Data year 2024

    Adolescent Mental and Behavioral Health data brief

    Accurate wording: About 17.9% of U.S. adolescents ages 12–17 were reported as currently having depression or anxiety in the cited survey.

    Not supported by this number: Do not use adolescent distress data as fundraising leverage.

    Verification pendingUS_DEPRESSION_ANXIETY_12_17

SAMHSA

4 records

  • 33.2%Past-year any mental illness, ages 18–25

    National · United States · Adults ages 18–25 · Data year 2024

    National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2024 — Detailed Tables, Section 6

    Accurate wording: SAMHSA's 2024 survey estimated past-year any mental illness at about 33.2% among adults ages 18–25.

    Not supported by this number: Do not present adult prevalence as a JRX student statistic.

    Verification pendingSAMHSA_AMI_18_25
  • 35.4%Past-year any mental illness, ages 26–29

    National · United States · Adults ages 26–29 · Data year 2024

    National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2024 — Detailed Tables, Section 6

    Accurate wording: Past-year any mental illness was estimated at about 35.4% for ages 26–29.

    Not supported by this number: Do not imply schooling alone determines adult mental health.

    Verification pendingSAMHSA_AMI_26_29
  • 34.0%Past-year any mental illness, ages 30–34

    National · United States · Adults ages 30–34 · Data year 2024

    National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2024 — Detailed Tables, Section 6

    Accurate wording: Past-year any mental illness was estimated at about 34.0% for ages 30–34.

    Not supported by this number: Do not use adult prevalence data as an emotional appeal.

    Verification pendingSAMHSA_AMI_30_34
  • 29.3%Past-year any mental illness, ages 35–39

    National · United States · Adults ages 35–39 · Data year 2024

    National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2024 — Detailed Tables, Section 6

    Accurate wording: Past-year any mental illness was estimated at about 29.3% for ages 35–39.

    Not supported by this number: Do not relabel the 35–39 band as 35–36.

    Verification pendingSAMHSA_AMI_35_39

School District of Lee County

4 records

  • 89.8%Lee County Class of 2025 graduation rate

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public high school four-year cohort · Data year Class of 2025 (2024–25 cohort) · Published 2026

    Lee County Schools Achieves Highest Graduation Rate in District History

    Accurate wording: Lee County reported a Class of 2025 graduation rate of 89.8%, the highest in district history.

    Not supported by this number: Do not imply this rate reflects JRX students or that graduation alone establishes readiness for adulthood.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_GRAD_RATE_2025
  • 166Languages reported within Lee County Schools

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school students and families · Data year 2024–2025 school year

    2024–2025 Impact Report — By The Numbers

    Accurate wording: Lee County Schools reported approximately 166 languages spoken across its student community.

    Not supported by this number: Never present linguistic diversity as a problem to be solved.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_SCHOOLS_LANGUAGES
  • 135Countries represented among Lee County Schools students

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school students · Data year 2024–2025 school year

    2024–2025 Impact Report — By The Numbers

    Accurate wording: Lee County Schools reported students representing approximately 135 countries.

    Not supported by this number: Do not present national origin as a predictor of achievement.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_SCHOOLS_COUNTRIES
  • 54,378Students living in homes where English is not the primary language, in the cited district year

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Public school students · Data year 2024–2025 school year

    2024–2025 Impact Report — By The Numbers

    Accurate wording: The district reported approximately 54,378 students living in homes where English is not the primary language.

    Not supported by this number: Do not equate home language with English proficiency, and never with academic ability.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_SCHOOLS_HOME_LANGUAGE_STUDENTS

U.S. Census Bureau

5 records

  • 6.8%Lee County youth ages 16–19 neither enrolled in school nor in the labor force

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Youth ages 16–19 · Data year ACS 2020–2024 five-year estimate

    American Community Survey Table B14005 (disconnected youth)

    Methodology: Survey estimate with a margin of error; 'disconnected' here means neither enrolled in school nor employed or actively in the labor force during the reference period.

    Accurate wording: In the cited ACS five-year estimate, approximately 6.8% of Lee County youth ages 16–19 were neither enrolled in school nor participating in the labor force.

    Not supported by this number: Do not describe these young people as unmotivated, and do not present the estimate as a current-year count.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_DISCONNECTED_YOUTH_16_19
  • 15.8%Lee County children living in poverty

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Children under 18 · Data year ACS 2024 one-year estimate

    American Community Survey Table B17001 (poverty status by age)

    Accurate wording: Approximately 15.8% of Lee County children under 18 lived in households below the federal poverty threshold in the 2024 ACS one-year estimate.

    Not supported by this number: Poverty is a condition families navigate, not a measure of capability, motivation, or worth.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_CHILD_POVERTY
  • 55.2%Lee County renters who are cost-burdened

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Renter households · Data year ACS 2024 one-year estimate

    American Community Survey Table B25070 (gross rent as a share of income)

    Methodology: Cost-burdened means spending 30% or more of household income on gross rent. Computed from ACS 2024 one-year Table B25070 rent-share categories.

    Accurate wording: Approximately 55.2% of Lee County renter households spend 30% or more of income on gross rent.

    Not supported by this number: Do not use housing pressure as an emotional fundraising device.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_RENTER_COST_BURDEN
  • 16.3%Fort Myers poverty rate

    Local · City of Fort Myers, Florida · All residents · Data year ACS 2024 one-year estimate

    American Community Survey Table B17001 (poverty status)

    Accurate wording: Approximately 16.3% of Fort Myers residents lived below the poverty threshold.

    Not supported by this number: Do not generalize a city rate to the county or the state.

    Verified 2026-08-22FORT_MYERS_POVERTY
  • 29.5%Fort Myers residents age 5+ who speak a language other than English at home

    Local · City of Fort Myers, Florida · Residents age 5 and older · Data year Most recent ACS estimate

    American Community Survey language spoken at home

    Accurate wording: Approximately 29.5% of Fort Myers residents age 5 and older speak a language other than English at home.

    Not supported by this number: Multilingualism is an asset. Never frame speaking another language at home as an academic deficit.

    Verification pendingFORT_MYERS_LANGUAGE_HOME

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

2 records

  • 22.0%Poor mental health reported by students with high school connectedness

    National · United States · High school students, self-reported · Data year 2021

    School Connectedness and Risk Behaviors and Experiences Among High School Students — YRBS 2021 (MMWR Suppl 72:1)

    Accurate wording: In the cited CDC analysis, 22.0% of students with high school connectedness reported poor mental health, compared with 40.1% of students with low connectedness.

    Not supported by this number: Do not claim that increasing connectedness causes a drop in poor mental health.

    Verification pendingCDC_CONNECTEDNESS_POOR_MH_HIGH
  • 40.1%Poor mental health reported by students with low school connectedness

    National · United States · High school students, self-reported · Data year 2021

    School Connectedness and Risk Behaviors and Experiences Among High School Students — YRBS 2021 (MMWR Suppl 72:1)

    Accurate wording: 40.1% of students with low school connectedness reported poor mental health in the cited CDC analysis.

    Not supported by this number: Do not present this comparison as a causal effect of a school program.

    Verification pendingCDC_CONNECTEDNESS_POOR_MH_LOW

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC

1 record

  • 60+ minRecommended daily physical activity for ages 6–17

    National · United States · Children and adolescents ages 6–17 · Data year Current federal guidance

    Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition (CDC summary)

    Accurate wording: Federal guidance recommends 60 minutes or more of daily physical activity for children and adolescents ages 6–17.

    Not supported by this number: Do not promise that athletics automatically raises grades.

    Verified 2026-08-22US_PHYSICAL_ACTIVITY_GUIDANCE

United Way of Lee, Hendry & Glades / United For ALICE

1 record

  • 48%Lee County households below poverty or classified as ALICE

    Local · Lee County, Florida · All households · Data year 2023

    ALICE in Lee County

    Methodology: The 48% figure is 12% of households below the federal poverty line plus 36% above poverty but below the ALICE household survival budget, as published in the 2023 county report. Some press coverage cites 42%; JRX publishes the figure that the primary report's own table supports.

    Accurate wording: Approximately 48% of Lee County households fall below the poverty line or meet the ALICE threshold (12% in poverty, 36% ALICE, 2023 data).

    Not supported by this number: Never describe these households as deficient, and never imply every JRX family is low-income.

    Verified 2026-08-22LEE_ALICE_HOUSEHOLDS

USF Florida Center for Behavioral Health Workforce

1 record

  • 103.7Licensed behavioral/mental-health professionals per 100,000 people in Lee County

    Local · Lee County, Florida · Licensed behavioral health workforce · Data year FY 2023–24

    Florida Behavioral Health Workforce Dashboard

    Accurate wording: Lee County reported approximately 103.7 licensed behavioral/mental-health professionals per 100,000 residents in FY 2023–24, compared with about 142.7 statewide.

    Not supported by this number: Never suggest JRX fills this gap, treats conditions, or that Success Specialists are therapists.

    Verification pendingLEE_BH_WORKFORCE

Research · 13 studies

Research informing the model

Evidence labels describe research maturity, not a grade. External research informs JRX practice; it does not establish JRX outcomes.

  • Review of randomized evaluations of tutoring programs

    Strong evidence

    J-PAL (Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab) · 2020s review · Research review · 96 randomized evaluations

    Research consistently finds that structured, frequent, high-quality tutoring produces meaningful learning gains.

    Informs: Academic Specialists

    Limitations: Effects vary substantially by tutor type, dosage, grade level, subject, and program structure. The review covers structured tutoring programs, not informal help.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim that any form of one-to-one academic assistance produces the same results, or that JRX has replicated these effects.

  • Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning

    Promising evidence

    RAND Corporation · 2015 · Quasi-experimental study · Approximately 62 schools and 11,000 students

    Evidence on personalized learning is promising rather than settled: implementation quality appears to matter more than the label.

    Informs: Personalized learning plans and hybrid models

    Limitations: Non-randomized comparisons, wide variation between schools, and 'personalized learning' covers very different practices.

    What we don’t claim: Do not present personalized learning as causally proven or universally effective.

    Open RAND CorporationVerification pending
  • School connectedness and adolescent health and well-being

    Strong evidence

    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · 2021 survey analysis and current guidance · Observational study

    Stronger school connectedness is consistently associated with better attendance, achievement, and well-being. Association, not proof of causation.

    Informs: Success Specialists

    Limitations: Cross-sectional and self-reported. Students with high connectedness may differ from peers in ways the analysis cannot fully separate.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim that a connectedness program causes reductions in poor mental health, and never imply school staff provide clinical treatment.

  • Randomized evaluation of project-based Advanced Placement courses

    Strong evidence

    Lucas Education Research and university research partners · 2021 · Randomized evaluation

    Rigorous project-based learning can produce meaningful academic outcomes when projects are intentionally designed around academic content and high expectations.

    Informs: Seven Quests — applied, project-based learning

    Limitations: Two specific AP courses with purpose-built curricula and teacher training. Context-specific.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim all project-based learning raises achievement by eight percentage points.

  • Career Academies: Long-Term Impacts on Labor Market Outcomes

    Strong evidence

    MDRC · 2008 · Randomized evaluation

    A randomized long-term study found that career-connected high school programs improved labor market outcomes years after graduation.

    Informs: School as Pathway — career-connected learning

    Limitations: Older study, specific program model and sites; effects concentrated among young men. Labor markets have changed since the study period.

    What we don’t claim: Do not present study-year dollar figures as today's dollars or promise earnings outcomes to JRX families.

    Open MDRCVerification pending
  • What Works Clearinghouse reviews of dual enrollment and CTE-focused programs

    Promising evidence

    Institute of Education Sciences / What Works Clearinghouse · Current reviews · Research review

    Evidence indicates stronger postsecondary participation among students involved in well-structured dual enrollment and CTE-focused experiences.

    Informs: Dual enrollment, credentials, and trades pathways

    Limitations: Program models differ widely; some reviewed studies are quasi-experimental, and selection into dual enrollment complicates interpretation.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim dual enrollment causes college completion for every participant.

  • Meta-analysis of service-learning program outcomes

    Promising evidence

    Peer-reviewed education research · 2011 and subsequent syntheses · Meta-analysis

    Service learning is associated with positive effects across several domains, with the strongest results in programs that connect service to curriculum and include structured reflection.

    Informs: Leadership Quest, AEIOU, and service

    Limitations: Wide variation in program quality; stronger effects appear where programs include curriculum links, student voice, community involvement, and structured reflection.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim that any service activity produces academic or civic gains.

  • Systematic reviews of youth participatory action research outcomes

    Promising evidence

    Peer-reviewed youth development research · Recent reviews · Research review

    Research documents agency, leadership, academic, career, and civic outcomes associated with genuine youth voice, while causal evidence remains limited.

    Informs: YouthLed Community Solutions and student voice

    Limitations: Largely qualitative and small-sample studies. Causal evidence is far less developed than in tutoring or career-academy research.

    What we don’t claim: Do not present youth voice programs as causally proven achievement interventions.

  • Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans

    Strong evidence

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC · Current edition · Federal guidance

    Federal guidance recommends 60 or more minutes of daily physical activity, and movement is associated with benefits for health, cognition, and emotional well-being.

    Informs: Athletics Quest and daily movement

    Limitations: Guidance synthesizes health evidence; it is not a study of school athletics programs or academic outcomes.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim athletics automatically causes higher grades.

  • Impact Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Education's Student Mentoring Program

    Promising evidence

    Institute of Education Sciences · 2009 · Randomized evaluation

    A major federal randomized evaluation found no significant overall impacts of school-based mentoring, which is why JRX treats mentoring quality — screening, training, matching, consistency, boundaries, duration, and monitoring — as the design problem.

    Informs: Good Souls Mentors

    Limitations: Evaluated a specific federal grant program with variable implementation, match duration, and mentor training. Later research finds effects concentrated in well-implemented, longer-duration matches.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim mentoring automatically improves academic outcomes, and do not hide the mixed evidence.

  • Research syntheses on family engagement and school communication

    Promising evidence

    Institute of Education Sciences and university research centers · Current syntheses · Research review

    Two-way, accessible family–school communication is a supported practice associated with stronger attendance, engagement, and connectedness.

    Informs: Parents and families as partners

    Limitations: Engagement practices are difficult to isolate experimentally, and effects depend heavily on accessibility and cultural responsiveness.

    What we don’t claim: Do not frame limited engagement as a lack of family care; access, language, scheduling, and trust are design responsibilities of the school.

  • Emerging research on AI-assisted instruction and tutoring tools

    Emerging evidence

    Multiple universities and research organizations · Ongoing · Research review

    JRX uses technology and AI as tools inside a human-led learning environment and will evaluate their effects on learning, agency, creativity, critical thinking, integrity, and digital literacy.

    Informs: Technology and AI-enhanced learning

    Limitations: Rapidly changing tools, short study horizons, few rigorous replications, and unresolved questions about academic integrity and over-reliance.

    What we don’t claim: Do not claim AI dramatically raises achievement, replaces teachers, or guarantees personalization.

  • No external evaluation exists yet

    JRX innovation — evaluation needed

    JRX Academy · In development · Observational study

    These elements are JRX innovations informed by established practice. They must be evaluated through JRX's own outcomes before any effectiveness claim is made.

    Informs: Life Atlas, HEART, Make a Move virtues, Conscious Crusader, CLVER Games, student cyphers

    Limitations: These are JRX-original components. They draw on established ideas — reflection, character practice, belonging, applied learning — but the specific architecture has not been externally evaluated.

    What we don’t claim: Do not attach outside research findings to JRX-original components as if they validated them.

Found an error?

We would rather correct a number than defend it. Send the page, the statistic, and the source you believe is correct and we will review it.

Contact JRX Academy →Back to Evidence & Context →