Skip to main content
Project AmeriXaNational Casting & Participation Call is open.Share your interest

A JRX Academy Quest · With YouthLed Community Solutions

YCS QuestYouthLed Community Solutions

  • Identify it.
  • Understand it.
  • Organize.
  • Build the solution.
  • Make the move.

Young people are not only preparing to inherit communities. They can help improve them now. YCS Quest gives students the structure, relationships, skills, and real opportunities to identify community challenges, listen to the people affected, develop solutions, organize others, take action, evaluate results, and contribute to larger movements for community improvement.

The central question

What is happening in our community that young people believe should be better — and what can we actually do about it?

  1. Question 1

    What is happening in our community that young people believe should be better — and what can we actually do about it?

  2. Question 2

    Who else needs to be part of the solution?

  3. Question 3

    What can we change together?

This is not

  • A pretend civic project
  • A classroom-only assignment
  • Volunteering selected entirely by adults
  • Adults deciding what young people should care about
  • A one-day service project without deeper learning
  • Partisan political organizing

This is

Youth-led community improvement.

Students study a real issue, listen to the people living it, build a response with them, act, and show what changed.

The YCS principle

Youth lead. Adults support. Communities participate.

Adults should

  • Companion
  • Coach
  • Connect
  • Teach
  • Safeguard
  • Provide resources
  • Help remove barriers
  • Offer expertise

Adults should not automatically

  • Select the issue
  • Determine the solution
  • Control every meeting
  • Speak for youth
  • Make every important decision
  • Take over when the work becomes difficult

This is real community work.

  • We saw something.
  • We learned about it.
  • We talked to people.
  • We listened.
  • We studied the evidence.
  • We brought people together.
  • We developed a solution.
  • We organized.
  • We acted.
  • We measured what happened.
  • We learned.
  • We made our next move.

The YCS action pathway

Local to action, in five phases.

  1. Teach-In
  2. Community Conversation
  3. Local Leaders Network
  4. Action Team
  5. Community Action
The pathway is not a race. A team can return to an earlier stage whenever new information requires it — going back to the Teach-In is intelligent when the evidence shows the team misunderstood the problem.

Phase One

Teach-In

Learn before you lead.

Students study a locally identified issue before proposing anything. Local priorities come first — no national issue agenda is handed down.

  • Issue File
  • Reed the Community
  • Community Asset Map
  • Root Cause Lab
  • Show and Prove

Phase Two

Community Conversation

Listen.

The purpose is not to present a finished solution. Students bring together the people closest to the issue and understand what they are experiencing.

  • Conscious Companioning
  • Conversation Builder
  • Question Bank
  • Listening Wall
  • Cruz Check

Phase Three

Local Leaders Network

Who needs to move together?

Students map the people and organizations who need to be part of the work — with or without formal titles — and build real relationships.

  • People Map
  • Does Something Already Exist?
  • Conscious Influencing
  • Story + Data

Phase Four

Action Team

Build the solution.

A shared opportunity for action emerges. The team defines the change it is pursuing, tests several possible solutions, and takes ownership.

  • Solution Lab
  • Solution Test
  • Conscious Organizing
  • Action Team Roles
  • YCS Action Budget

Phase Five

Community Action

Make the move.

The team executes. Some problems require service, others require systems change, and some require both. Then the team measures what actually changed.

  • Community Action HQ
  • Next Move
  • Impact Board
  • After-Action Review
  • YCS Story Bank

Students can always see: where are we? What have we completed? What comes next?

Phase one · Teach-In

Learn before you lead.

Students begin by studying an issue their own community is living with. Local priorities come first — no national agenda is assigned to a team.
  • Education
  • Neighborhood safety
  • Youth opportunities
  • Transportation
  • Food access
  • Housing
  • Environmental conditions
  • Loneliness
  • Community belonging
  • Mental wellness
  • Recreation
  • Technology access
  • Economic opportunity
  • Violence prevention
  • Inclusion
  • Community beautification

Issue File

  • What is happening?
  • Who is affected?
  • How do we know?
  • How long has this been happening?
  • What has already been tried?
  • Who is already working on it?
  • What information are we missing?
  • Why does this matter?

Show and Prove

A student says: “Young people don’t have enough opportunities.” The response is always: show and prove. What evidence do we have?

  • Surveys
  • Interviews
  • Public data
  • Observations
  • Maps
  • Photographs
  • Testimony
  • Attendance
  • Records
  • Research
  • Community conversations
  • Lived experience

Lived experience matters. Evidence strengthens our ability to understand and act.

Reed the Community

Eleven dimensions of a real place.

The JRX practice of Reed the Field, applied to a community. A team reads the whole field before proposing anything.
People
Who lives with this issue?
Place
Where is it happening?
Systems
What systems affect it?
History
How did we get here?
Assets
What strengths already exist?
Challenges
What is making things difficult?
Power
Who can make decisions?
Resources
What is available?
Voices
Who has been heard?
Missing Voices
Who has not been heard?
Opportunities
Where could movement occur?

Community Asset Map

Start with assets, not only problems.

A community is more than its problems. Before asking what is broken, ask: what is already strong here?
  • Residents
  • Young people
  • Elders
  • Organizations
  • Businesses
  • Schools
  • Faith communities
  • Nonprofits
  • Government
  • Neighborhood leaders
  • Artists
  • Coaches
  • Parents
  • Mentors
  • Informal leaders
  • Spaces
  • Traditions
  • Knowledge
  • Networks
  • Resources

What is already strong here?

Root Cause Lab

Problem or symptom?

What we see

Young people have nowhere to go after school.

  1. Why? The programs that existed closed.
  2. Why? Funding ended and no one carried them forward.
  3. Why? No stable local structure owned them.
  4. Why? Youth needs were not represented where decisions were made.

A symptom is what we see. An underlying condition is what keeps producing it.

Teams do not design a solution before they understand what they are actually trying to change.

Phase two · Community Conversation

Listen.

The purpose is not to present a finished solution. It is to understand what the people closest to the issue are experiencing.
  • Young people
  • Parents
  • Residents
  • Teachers
  • Business owners
  • Nonprofit leaders
  • Elected or appointed officials
  • Community advocates
  • Elders
  • Service providers
  • People directly affected by the issue

Conscious Companioning

YCS’s first training practice.

  • Listen deeply
  • Ask instead of assume
  • Respect lived experience
  • Make space
  • Remain curious
  • Understand before attempting to influence
  • Recognize dignity
  • Build relationships
  • Avoid treating people as problems to solve

What do we need to understand from the people closest to this issue?

Community Conversation Builder

Purpose
Why are we bringing people together?
Who
Whose voices need to be present?
Questions
What do we need to understand?
Space
How will we create a welcoming environment?
Facilitators
Who will guide the conversation?
Listeners
Who will document what is heard?
Follow-up
What happens after the conversation?

Questions before answers

Examples to build from. Students develop their own.

  • What are you experiencing?
  • What is working?
  • What is not working?
  • Why do you think this is happening?
  • What have people already tried?
  • What would meaningful improvement look like?
  • Who needs to be involved?
  • What resources already exist?
  • What would you change first?
  • What should young people understand before acting?

Listening Wall

What we heard.

  • Strengths
  • Concerns
  • Ideas
  • Needs
  • Questions
  • Disagreements
  • Opportunities
  • Possible partners
  • Next moves

Do not erase disagreement to create artificial consensus. Record it honestly.

Cruz Check

What do we know?
Evidence.
What do we think?
Interpretation.
What can we prove?
Support.
What did the community tell us?
Community voice, in their words.

This is what keeps a team from confusing its own assumptions with community voice.

Phase three · Local Leaders Network

Who needs to move together?

Leadership is not the same as position. A leader may be:
  • A student
  • A parent
  • An elder
  • A neighborhood resident
  • A teacher
  • An organizer
  • A business owner
  • An elected leader
  • An artist
  • A coach
  • A nonprofit leader
  • A faith leader
  • Someone with lived experience

People Map

  • Name
  • Relationship to issue
  • What they know
  • What they can contribute
  • Who knows them
  • Relationship status
  • Next move

Relationship status

  • Unknown
  • Introduction needed
  • Connected
  • Listening
  • Interested
  • Partner
  • Active

Do not build alone

A solution becomes stronger when the people affected help build it.

  • People already doing related work
  • Organizations with expertise
  • Potential collaborators
  • People with resources
  • People with different perspectives
  • People directly affected

Does something already exist? If yes — should we strengthen, connect, improve, or expand it instead of creating something new?

Conscious Influencing

Influence is not manipulation.

YCS’s second training practice: communicating information and ideas responsibly.
  • Storytelling
  • Public speaking
  • Dialogue
  • Presenting evidence
  • Persuasion
  • Communicating across differences
  • Media
  • Interviewing
  • Writing
  • Listening while advocating
  • Understanding audience
  1. See.
  2. Understand.
  3. Consider.
  4. Act.

Data

38% of surveyed students say there is nowhere to go after school.

Story

What that reality feels like at 4pm for one student, in her own words.

Story without evidence can be incomplete. Data without people can become abstract. Use both responsibly.

Phase four · Action Team

Build the solution.

Every Action Team defines

  • Issue
  • Purpose
  • Desired change
  • People
  • Strategy
  • Action
  • Timeline
  • Resources
  • Responsibilities
  • Evidence
  • Measure of progress

Solution Lab

Teams generate several possibilities before choosing. For each one:

  • What would it change?
  • Who benefits?
  • Who could be harmed?
  • What would it cost?
  • What resources are required?
  • Who needs to participate?
  • Is anyone already doing it?
  • Can young people actually influence it?
  • Is it sustainable?
  • How would we know whether it worked?

Solution Test

Impact
Could it matter?
Feasibility
Can we actually do it?
Youth leadership
Can young people meaningfully lead?
Community support
Do people want it?
Resources
Can we obtain what is needed?
Sustainability
Could it continue?
Equity
Who benefits and who might be excluded?
Evidence
Why do we believe this solution could work?

Conscious Organizing

  1. Individual concern
  2. Shared priority
  3. Collective action
  • Building teams
  • Establishing shared priorities
  • Assigning responsibility
  • Recruiting
  • Communicating
  • Meetings
  • Relationship-building
  • Coalition-building
  • Project management
  • Mobilization
  • Resolving conflict
  • Collective action

Action Team roles

Older youth increasingly facilitate, organize, and mentor younger participants.

  • Listening Lead
  • Research Lead
  • Community Relationships Lead
  • Story Lead
  • Data Lead
  • Action Lead
  • Resource Lead
  • Communication Lead
  • Project Lead
  • Documentation Lead
  • Evaluation Lead

The three YCS capacities

Companion. Influence. Organize.

  1. Capacity 1

    Companion

    Understand people.

  2. Capacity 2

    Influence

    Communicate meaning.

  3. Capacity 3

    Organize

    Move people toward shared action.

Phase five · Community Action

Make the move.

Some problems require service. Others require systems change. Some require both. YCS Quest is not limited to service projects.
  • Creating a new service
  • Improving an existing program
  • Organizing a community event
  • Building a youth space
  • Community beautification
  • Public education
  • Resource distribution
  • Policy recommendation
  • Advocacy
  • Awareness campaign
  • Mutual aid
  • Mentoring
  • Environmental improvement
  • Community art
  • Research
  • Civic engagement
  • Neighborhood initiative
  • Coalition campaign

Community Action HQ

  • Community issue
  • Desired change
  • Current YCS phase
  • Action Team
  • Community partners
  • Current goal
  • Next move
  • Owner
  • Deadline
  • Resources
  • Evidence
  • Results
  • Challenges
  • What we are learning

Next Move

What’s the next move?

  • Action
  • Owner
  • Support
  • Due date
  • Expected result

Good intentions without ownership rarely become action. Every meeting ends with: what’s the next move?

Decision architecture

Every meaningful decision is labeled.

Youth decision
Young people decide.
Intergenerational decision
Youth and adults decide together.
Adult responsibility
An adult makes the final determination because of safety, legal, fiduciary, employment, contractual, or organizational responsibility.

Adult responsibility is never used as an excuse to unnecessarily remove youth leadership.

Resources make action possible

YCS Action Budget & resource mobilization.

Students learn to manage

  • Project costs
  • Supplies
  • Transportation
  • Events
  • Communication
  • Stipends where applicable
  • Grants
  • Donations
  • Sponsorship
  • Revenue where appropriate

Recognizing youth contribution, as YCS funding permits

  1. Support for adult infrastructure
  2. Youth stipends
  3. Paid youth employment

What do we need? Who could help us get it?

  • Money
  • People
  • Knowledge
  • Materials
  • Space
  • Equipment
  • Connections
  • Communication
  • Authority
  • Time
  • Talent

Resources are more than money. Students learn to mobilize resources rather than letting the absence of money automatically end an idea.

Partner Pitch

A real presentation to potential partners, built from the team’s own evidence.

  • The problem
  • What we learned
  • What the community said
  • Our solution
  • Why we believe it can work
  • What we are doing
  • What we need
  • How you can help

Nonpartisan civic engagement

Study the issue. Use evidence. Participate responsibly.

Students may

  • Research policy
  • Meet public officials
  • Examine government decisions
  • Communicate concerns
  • Recommend changes
  • Advocate around community issues
  • Learn about public systems

What we teach

  • Study the issue.
  • Understand different positions.
  • Use evidence.
  • Participate responsibly.

YCS Quest is nonpartisan. It is never used to tell students which political party, candidate, or ideology to support.

Service or system?

Relief and changed conditions are not the same thing.

Immediate need

Provide food.

System question

Why are families consistently without enough food?

Both can matter. YCS helps young people understand the difference between providing relief and changing conditions.

Power Map — who can change this?

  • People affected
  • Decision-makers
  • Influencers
  • Institutions
  • Supporters
  • Possible opposition
  • Funders
  • Implementers
  • Who has formal power?
  • Who has informal influence?
  • Who has lived experience?
  • Who controls resources?
  • Who could stop the solution?
  • Who could accelerate it?
  • Who is currently missing?

CO4 — difference is part of the work

Disagreement is not failure. Community solutions usually involve people who do not agree about everything.

Coexist
We may disagree and remain in relationship.
Collaborate
We create together.
Cooperate
We coordinate around shared interests.
Compete
Different ideas may compete for support while dignity remains intact.

One model, three divisions

Community Explorers. Community Builders. Youth Solution Leaders.

Ages 5–8

Community Explorers

  • · Noticing
  • · Caring
  • · Asking questions
  • · Identifying community strengths
  • · Helping
  • · Listening
  • · Simple problem-solving
  • · Participating in collective action

Adults provide substantial structure. Young students still have authentic choices. Guiding question: what could make our school, block, park, or neighborhood better?

Ages 8–14

Community Builders

  • · Researching issues
  • · Conducting interviews
  • · Participating in surveys
  • · Facilitating conversations
  • · Analyzing findings
  • · Proposing solutions
  • · Joining Action Teams
  • · Managing responsibilities
  • · Communicating with partners
  • · Evaluating results

Students carry increasing responsibility for the work and for each other.

Ages 14–19

Youth Solution Leaders

  • · Leading Teach-Ins
  • · Facilitating Community Conversations
  • · Organizing networks
  • · Conducting research
  • · Building partnerships
  • · Developing strategy
  • · Leading Action Teams
  • · Communicating publicly
  • · Engaging institutions
  • · Developing budgets
  • · Mobilizing resources
  • · Evaluating impact
  • · Mentoring younger students

Older youth increasingly facilitate, organize, and mentor. Formal YCS leadership roles beyond the school Quest follow established YCS eligibility, competency, contribution, values, and readiness requirements.

YCS leadership pathway

  1. Participant
  2. Trained contributor
  3. Committee / Action Team leader
  4. National leader

Advancement is not earned merely through attendance. It reflects:

  • Contribution
  • Competency
  • Character
  • Readiness
  • Responsibility
  • Demonstrated leadership

Local first

National work grows out of local experience.

Local first. Students do not begin with “what national campaign should we join?” They begin with what young people and communities are actually experiencing. When similar priorities appear across communities, they may become candidates for broader collective action through YCS’s established governance and leadership structures.
  1. One community
  2. Multiple communities
  3. Shared pattern
  4. Shared priority
  5. Collective action

We are working locally, but we are not working alone.

YCS Story Bank

Students help tell the story of youth-led solutions.

  • Photos
  • Interviews
  • Student reflections
  • Community voices
  • Before / after evidence
  • Data
  • Milestones
  • Challenges
  • Outcomes
  • Quotes
  • Videos
  • Audio
  • Journalism
  • Student-created media

Ethical storytelling

People are not content.

  • Do we have permission?
  • Are we representing the person accurately?
  • Are we protecting privacy?
  • Are we showing dignity?
  • Are we presenting people only through their problems?
  • Is the person able to speak for themselves?

Measure change

What changed?

A YCS Quest does not end with “we held an event.” Activity is not automatically impact.

Outputs

What did we do?

  • · 50 residents attended
  • · 100 surveys completed
  • · 25 trees planted

Outcomes

What happened because of it?

  • · New relationships formed
  • · Access increased
  • · Behavior changed
  • · Policy changed
  • · Knowledge increased
  • · A service was created

Impact

What longer-term condition are we attempting to improve?

  • · The condition itself, tracked over years

Impact Board

  • Problem
  • Baseline
  • Action
  • Evidence
  • Result
  • Community feedback
  • What changed
  • What didn’t
  • What we learned
  • Next move

After-Action Review

What happened?

  • What did we intend?
  • What actually happened?
  • What worked?
  • What did not?
  • What surprised us?
  • What did the community say?
  • What evidence do we have?
  • Did we create any unintended effects?
  • What would we do differently?
  • What is the next move?

When something does not work

The work is not over because the first solution failed.

  • Adjust
  • Rebuild
  • Expand
  • Partner
  • Stop
  • Try something different
  • Investigate again

Returning to the Teach-In is intelligent when the evidence shows the team misunderstood the problem.

My YCS Portfolio & the YCS Solution File

What did you actually help change?

Every student’s portfolio saves

  • Issues explored
  • Teach-Ins
  • Research
  • Surveys
  • Interviews
  • Community Conversations
  • Leadership roles
  • Partnerships
  • Action Teams
  • Projects
  • Presentations
  • Stories
  • Resources mobilized
  • Community actions
  • Results
  • Impact evidence
  • Reflections
  • Skills demonstrated

Every initiative keeps a permanent record

  • Issue
  • Community
  • Youth leaders
  • Adult companions
  • Partners
  • What we learned
  • Community voice
  • Proposed solution
  • Action
  • Resources
  • Results
  • Evidence
  • Current status
  • Next move

Status

  • Listening
  • Learning
  • Connecting
  • Organizing
  • Building
  • Acting
  • Measuring
  • Improving
  • Sustained

Where the Quests converge

YCS is learning applied to community.

Leadership
Organize people.
Law
Understand systems, policy, rights, and responsibilities.
Academics
Research, calculate, analyze, write, and communicate.
Arts
Tell stories and imagine possibilities.
Technology
Build tools, map information, communicate, and analyze data.
Hospitality
Welcome people and create belonging.
Athletics
Apply teamwork, discipline, health, and community-building.

YCS Quest success rubric

Ten dimensions, four levels.

Students are not evaluated on whether they completely solved the community problem.
Listening
Did they understand before acting?
Research
Did they gather credible information?
Community voice
Did affected people participate?
Collaboration
Did they build relationships?
Leadership
Did young people exercise genuine responsibility?
Strategy
Was the proposed action connected to the actual problem?
Action
Did they move from idea to execution?
Evidence
Can they Show and Prove what happened?
Reflection
Did they learn and adjust?
Character
Did they act with dignity, humility, responsibility, courage, and respect?
  • Beginning
  • Developing
  • Proficient
  • Advanced

The question after every project

Not “project complete.” What now?

  • Did the problem improve?
  • Does the action need to continue?
  • Who should own it next?
  • Should it become a program?
  • Should another organization carry it forward?
  • Is policy change needed?
  • Should it expand?
  • Is the issue appearing in other communities?
  • Could this become a shared YCS priority?

State of Our Community Solutions

Published at the end of each year.

  • Issues investigated
  • Teach-Ins
  • Community Conversations
  • Young people engaged
  • Community members engaged
  • Partners
  • Action Teams
  • Actions completed
  • Resources mobilized
  • Solutions built
  • People served
  • Changes documented
  • Stories captured
  • What did we learn about our community?
  • What did we learn about leadership?
  • What should we work on next?

Core YCS philosophy

Notice. Listen. Learn. Connect. Organize. Solve. Act. Measure.

  1. 01

    Notice

    Something should be better.

  2. 02

    Listen

    Understand people and place.

  3. 03

    Learn

    Study the issue.

  4. 04

    Connect

    Find the people.

  5. 05

    Organize

    Build shared purpose and responsibility.

  6. 06

    Solve

    Design a response.

  7. 07

    Act

    Make the move.

  8. 08

    Measure

    Determine what happened.

  9. 09

    Learn again

    Use evidence.

  10. 10

    Build again

    Improve the solution.

A student completing YCS Quest can say

  • I learned how to understand a community issue.
  • I listened to people affected by it.
  • I researched before deciding what should happen.
  • I brought people together.
  • I helped develop a solution.
  • I accepted responsibility for part of the work.
  • We took real action.
  • I can show what happened.
  • I understand what still needs to change.
  • I know how to make the next move.
  • Listen deeply.
  • Lead with others.
  • Organize with purpose.
  • Build the solution.
  • Show and prove.
  • Make the move.

Reading the field

Reading the field: the conditions students are solving for

48%

Lee County households below poverty or classified as ALICE

Lee County, Florida · All households · 2023
United Way of Lee, Hendry & Glades / United For ALICE

ALICE means Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed — households that work yet earn less than the cost of basics in their county.

View source and methodology
Statistic
Lee County households below poverty or classified as ALICE
Geography
Lee County, Florida
Population
All households
Data year
2023
Source
United Way of Lee, Hendry & Glades / United For ALICEALICE in Lee County
Methodology
The 48% figure is 12% of households below the federal poverty line plus 36% above poverty but below the ALICE household survival budget, as published in the 2023 county report. Some press coverage cites 42%; JRX publishes the figure that the primary report's own table supports.
Accurate wording
Approximately 48% of Lee County households fall below the poverty line or meet the ALICE threshold (12% in poverty, 36% ALICE, 2023 data).
JRX verification
Verified by JRX on 2026-08-22

15.8%

Lee County children living in poverty

Lee County, Florida · Children under 18 · ACS 2024 one-year estimate
U.S. Census Bureau

View source and methodology
Statistic
Lee County children living in poverty
Geography
Lee County, Florida
Population
Children under 18
Age range
Under 18
Data year
ACS 2024 one-year estimate
Source
U.S. Census BureauAmerican Community Survey Table B17001 (poverty status by age)
Margin / CI
±2.3 percentage points
Accurate wording
Approximately 15.8% of Lee County children under 18 lived in households below the federal poverty threshold in the 2024 ACS one-year estimate.
JRX verification
Verified by JRX on 2026-08-22

16.3%

Fort Myers poverty rate

City of Fort Myers, Florida · All residents · ACS 2024 one-year estimate
U.S. Census Bureau

How to read it: City-level figure. Fort Myers data must never be presented as Lee County data, or the reverse.

View source and methodology
Statistic
Fort Myers poverty rate
Geography
City of Fort Myers, Florida
Population
All residents
Data year
ACS 2024 one-year estimate
Source
U.S. Census BureauAmerican Community Survey Table B17001 (poverty status)
How to read it
City-level figure. Fort Myers data must never be presented as Lee County data, or the reverse.
Accurate wording
Approximately 16.3% of Fort Myers residents lived below the poverty threshold.
JRX verification
Verified by JRX on 2026-08-22

Explore the evidence →